McChurch
Fast-Food Christianity?
by Dan Schaeffer
What do Earl Woods, father of the famous
golfer Tiger Woods, musician and actor John Tesh, radio personality Dr.
Laura Schlessinger, former leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev
and former television star and singer, Jim Nabors, all have in common? The
answer is that they have all hit the mega-church personality circuit. If
you wonder what spiritual connection these personalities have with Christianity,
you aren't alone.
While Dr. Laura is wellknown for her strong moral convictions, her presence
in a church is interesting, given that she's a practicing Jew. It is equally
unlikely that Mikhail Gorbachev has any deep spiritual interest in the things
of God or the gospel of Jesus Christ, since most communists (or true socialists)
are atheists. Why then are their appearances trumpeted at a large, conservative
evangelical church? What do the presence of these personalities have to
do with the gospel you might ask? The answer is that they are a great way
to get people in the doors of a church.
| Voicing concern about the direction and extent to
which some churches are going to attract new people, Chuck Colson has called
this trend the "McChurch" mentality. The church becomes simply
another retail outlet and faith just another commodity. |
Over 40 years ago, A.W. Tozer noted that it was increasingly difficult
to get Christians to meetings where God was the chief attraction. In many
churches today, where a consumer consciousness has been ingrained in the
philosophy of ministry, there is competition for the hearts and souls of
the unchurched. As a result, many mega churches are paying for the biggest
name Christian (and even non-Christian) personalities to appear, while at
the same time equipping themselves with the newest state of the art technology,
professional musicians and video productions that rival those of MTV. It
is difficult to shake the eerie feeling that the church has gone Las Vegas.
Few smaller churches can compete with the presentations that the mega-church
can offer. While all churches can sing the same worship songs, how many
have full orchestras, with special lighting, professional song leaders,
musicians and dancers on stage? While every church can use drama or skits
to convey a message, how many can boast of professional actors and scriptwriters
on their church staff? At best, the smaller church comes off looking awkwardly
amateurish next to the bigger church's production. And how many can afford
the hefty appearance fees of the big-name Christian personalities?
When appearances reign supreme, it is tempting to play to the crowd.
Like the mega church pastor who was so overcome with joy and thankfulness
at reaching the church's fund raising goals that he fell down upon the ground
and spontaneously cried -- at all five services.
More and more, larger churches are beginning to attract people by de-emphasizing
the harsher elements of the gospel, or even eliminating them altogether.
As one secular critic noted "some clergy have simply airbrushed sin
out of their language. Having substituted therapy for spiritual discernment,
they appeal to the nurturing God who helps his people cope. Heaven by this
creed is never having to say no to yourself, and God is never having to
say you're sorry."1 Some conservative evangelical churches are opting
to forego the traditional Biblical exposition in favor of "felt need"
focused sermons and worship. Doctrine is perceived as dry and dull and out
of touch with the unchurched, and traditional hymns are tired and boring.
| ...many mega churches are paying for the biggest name
Christian (and even non-Christian) personalities to appear...with the newest
state of the art technology, professional musicians and video productions
that rival those of MTV. It is difficult to shake the eerie feeling that
the church has gone Las Vegas. |
A feeling that older hymns were out of touch prompted many
cutting edge churches to largely abandon them in favor of newer, more "user
friendly" choruses. Yet, many contemporary worship songs in churches
focus only on the "take away" value of Christianity, of what God
will do for us, and less and less of what we can do for God. "All to
Jesus I surrender, all to him I freely give," is apparently no longer
a priority. Services are designed with maximum "felt need" value
in mind. But if meeting the felt needs of people becomes primary, how can
true worship be experienced?
Many mega churches operate on the premise that when non-believers are
brought into a worship service they are witnessing "alien activity."
Therefore they are viewed primarily as an audience to observe the worshippers
(usually a worship team). But is worship primarily a time to watch others
sing about God, or to speak to God, and he to us?
Is the purpose of worship to make us feel better about ourselves, or
to make us holy? In the gospel we discover the bad news about ourselves
and the good news about our God. Should either of these elements be missing
from worship, can it still truly be worship?
Voicing concern about the direction and extent to which some churches
are going to attract new people, Chuck Colson has called this trend the
"McChurch" mentality. The church becomes simply another retail
outlet and faith just another commodity. "Spiritual consumers are interested
not in what the church stands for but in the fulfillment it can deliver.
This consumer mentality pressures churches to respond in kind." Colson
states bluntly, "Therapy and the promise of material reward may lure
people into our churches, but so might free reefers handed out in the sanctuary
-- and it's debatable which would do more harm."2
If the "customer" becomes king within the church, what place
in the service does the King of kings occupy? Can any worship service be
designed which makes the unchurched really comfortable with the true gospel
of Christ? One church in the south uses reruns of the Andy Griffith Show
to draw people to a Sunday school class. They watch an old episode and discuss
how Andy, Barney, Aunt Bee and Opie handled their problem, attempting to
weave biblical principles into the discussion. Hundreds attend each week.
Maybe Las Vegas and Mayberry aren't that far away from each other after
all!
It's possible to get hundreds, even thousands, to church by promising
to give away a new Mercedes Benz, but how interested are those people then
going to be in the gospel? If we're not careful, the gospel could begin
to be perceived as little more than an annoying distraction to the seeker
-- like a business call in the middle of the annual office party. When you
advertise one thing, but then deliver another, you can correctly be accused
of bait and switch.
The church becoming user friendly to the culture may not be the real
problem. Perhaps we really need to ask if the church is becoming user centered
and focused. The church is the body of Christ, and true worship must have
him as the focus.
Enthusiasm for this method of ministry may actually be beginning to wane.
While the baby boomers were attracted to this model, Eddie Gibbs and Ian
Coffey, authors of Church Next, point out that only about 25 percent of
baby boomers were ever drawn back into the church.
The success of the seeker sensitive worship approach has been limited
to a certain segment of the boomer generation, and has made little true
impact on the never churched. But there does appear to be another blip on
the radar screen. Some baby boomers are leaving conservative evangelical
churches to attend liturgical churches. Wearying of celebrity based religion
built around the personality and communication gifts of one pastor; they
have gone in search of reverence, to find a place where God is the center
of attention.
If some boomers are beginning to tire of the seeker sensitive approach,
many in Generation X were never attracted to it in the first place. Unlike
their boomer parents, GenXers are not interested in listening to people
who presume to have all the answers. Rather, they want to meet people who
have a transforming relationship with God. What is important to Generation
X is a genuine experience with God.
As Gibbs and Coffey say, "Seeker sensitive worship held in an auditorium
devoid of religious symbols and led by polished professional performers
who are removed from the tattered and tawdry world of daily experience holds
little appeal for many GenXers. They know that life is not tidy or filled
with predictable, happy endings. Their spiritual awareness is triggered
by rituals both ancient and relevant. If the Christian church fails to rediscover
its own rich heritage, created in pre-literate societies, it will find it
increasingly difficult to hold a generation shaped by a post-literate culture."3
Suspicious of bigness, advertising and egos, GenXers want something specific:
churches that are down to earth and unpretentious. Polished and impeccable
images turn them off. On Sunday morning, about 275 worshippers gather weekly
for worship at National Community Church in Washington, D.C. They are predominantly
single and GenX, who have been part of the MTV-groomed generation that responds
to the notion of absolute truth with a postmodern "Whatever."
Says one member; "We're moving out of the whole stage of "If
you can prove it's true, I'll believe it. The GenX people want an experience.
And if it's an experience they like, then they'll believe, and they'll ultimately
try to figure out the truth."4
Boomers want propositional truth, Xer's want experiential truth. Which
is right? Certainly there is truth in both points of view.
Responding to Christ involves both responding to propositional truth
and an experience with the living God. Which comes first? Does it matter?
Some are led to Christ by a certain gospel truth that pierced their hearts,
others by a certain experience they had in relationship with the church
and other Christians. Some people's experience simply preceded their doctrinal
affirmation. At what point a person truly responded to the gospel of Christ
is not nearly as important as the fact that they did. Sally Morgenthaler,
author of Worship
Evangelism: Inviting
Unbelievers Into the Presence of God, believes that a main problem of
many modern mega-churches and their followers is that many church leaders
see the purpose of the church as only evangelism and growth. Yet, she says,
the evangelistic motivation cannot be sustained indefinitely without the
heartbeat of worship. In fact it is very difficult for a church to witness
convincingly about a God we do not know and love in our inmost being. It
is too easy to slip from adoration to demand.
Morgenthaler writes, "The hour we spend at services like these (mega-churches)
will most likely be glutted with polished performances and pedestal personalities.
Our emotions will be tapped by well-planned musical sequences and segues,
culturally correct humor, pithy anecdotes and
well-rehearsed humility. We shall have our brains stuffed with information
about how to make life work and how to work harder at life. Most likely,
we shall leave feeling very good about ourselves. But one thing we shall
not have done: we shall not have met with God."
"A true encounter with God leaves us with a lot more than good feelings.
It leaves us with changed hearts and calls us to changed lives. Very simply,
to experience God's presence is to be transformed from the inside out. Where
is this transformation today? More and more of us
are leaving our worship centers and sanctuaries without even so much
as a smudge on our glossy finish. We are going out the same way we came
in. We may have had an entertainment fix, a self-esteem fix, a self-righteousness
fix or a self-help fix, but we have not been changed."5
Calling it "the liturgical fidget," C.S. Lewis noted that some
pastors and churches, "believe people can be lured to go to church
by incessant brightenings, lightenings, lengthenings, abridgements, simplifications
and complications of the service. Novelty, simply as such, can have only
an entertainment value." He lamented that "novelty may fix our
attention not even on the service, but on the celebrant."6
When churches become user-centered and focused, Christ and his Kingdom
eventually bears little resemblance to the true gospel. Glitzy worship,
famous people, even sentimental TV re-runs will never make the gospel more
palatable to those who have no real interest in the Kingdom of God.
When Jesus spoke about picking up our cross, denying ourselves and following
him, the crowd's interest in "the miraculous Galilean" waned dramatically.
Our experiences are unlikely to be very different. Getting warm bodies into
pews isn't the same as getting souls into the Kingdom.
Any method for attracting people to churches is legitimate as long as
it never misrepresents the true gospel. And, just for the record, the narrow
road Jesus spoke of doesn't lead to Mayberry.
1 Kenneth Woodward in Newsweek, quoted in "Welcome
to McChurch," by Chuck Colson with Ellen Santilli Vaughn, (Christianity
Today, November 23, 1992).
2 Chuck Colson with Ellen Santilli Vaughn, in "Welcome
to McChurch," (Christianity Today, November 23, 1992).
3 Eddie Gibbs & Ian Coffey, Church Next, (InterVarsity
Press, England, 2001, pg. 124).
4 Caryle Murphy, The Washington Post, "The Spirit
Moves Generation X in a Different Way," (L.A. Times, 8/28/01).
5 Sally Morgenthaler, Worship Evangelism: Inviting Unbelievers
into the Presence of God, (Grand Rapids, MI, Zondervan, 1995, pg. 52).
6 C.S. Lewis, The Business of Heaven, (Inspirational Press,
1987, New York, pg. 424-425).
Dan Schaeffer and his family live in Northern California.
Return to Plain Truth Ministries
Home Page |