|
Left Behind!
Will it happen to you?
by Rod Dreher
In 1980, I was 13 years old, and someone
had given me a copy of Hal Lindsey's mega-selling The Late Great Planet
Earth to read. The Soviets were in Afghanistan, the American hostages
were in Tehran, I had become fixated on the fear of nuclear war and -- suddenly,
thanks to Late Great, the chaos all made sense. There was no need to be
afraid. This was all part of God's plan. Accept Jesus as your personal Savior,
and you wouldn't have to suffer through the worst of what was to come, for
you would be spirited away in the Rapture. And if you didn't -- well, too
bad for you when the Antichrist comes knocking.
The premillenial Rapture is the belief, held by many Protestant Christians,
that believers will, "in the twinkling of an eye," be taken body
and soul into heaven to meet Jesus Christ -- this, just as the world is
on the brink of seven years of unprecedented suffering and strife, preceding
the Second Coming and the end of history. If you think the end of the world
is upon us, it's easy to see why believing you won't have to suffer the
worst of it would be calming. On the other hand, you might exchange one
set of fears for another. When I was in Late Great's grip, I would wake
up every morning in a mild state of panic, wondering if the Rapture had
happened while I was sleeping, and I'd beenleft behind!
I don't believe in the premillenial Rapture anymore, but it's easy to
see why so many people want to. For Christians and others whose religious
beliefs predict an apocalyptic final act (even Islam and the New Age have
their own versions), these days are unusually anxious. It isn't difficult
to find in today's headlines -- wars, rumors of wars, natural disasters,
plagues, religious strife and technology run amok -- evidence for the belief
that history is quickening toward some sort of climax.
| "What we're dealing with are people who are scared
and confused by what's going on in the world today, and who aren't getting
the information they need to separate what's real from what's vain and even
harmful speculation." |
No wonder, then, that the same sensational theological teachings
that excited believers in the 1970s and earlier are more popular than ever.
The Left Behind fiction series, whose title refers to those who weren't
raptured before the Apocalypse, may well be the best-selling Christian books
of all time, not counting the Bible.
Given the amount of popular publicity given to the Rapture and its attendant
doctrines, it may surprise (and disappoint) many Christians to learn that
this set of beliefs, generally called "dispensationalism," is
not explicitly taught by the Bible, nor has ever been widely held by Christians.
In fact, neither Roman Catholicism nor Eastern Orthodoxy, which together
include most of the world's Christians who live now and who have ever lived,
profess dispensationalist eschatology (which means the study of the End
Times). The Rapture is also alien to the historical Protestant confessions.
Martin Luther had never heard of such a thing, nor had John Calvin, Ulrich
Zwingli or any other Protestant divine until a pair of 19th-century British
small-sect pastors developed the notion apparently independent of each other.
One of the men, John Nelson Darby, traveled widely in North America between
1859 and 1874, where his dispensationalist teachings spread like wildfire
(for a more detailed explanation of this theology from a dispensationalist
viewpoint, see page 9).
Given current world events, particularly in the Middle East and Europe,
the dispensationalist fire continues to roar among Christians, who understandably
want to know if today's headlines can be explained and tomorrow's headlines
can be predicted from ancient Scripture. Unfortunately, many Christians
are under the impression that dispensationalist teaching -- on Christianity's
theological fringe, historically speaking -- is the first and last word
on the matter. Most Catholic priests, as well as their mainline Protestant
counterparts, downplay or ignore their congregations' natural -- and sociologically
predictable -- interest in the End Times, leaving lay believers open to
instruction by those who, however misguided, take it seriously. That's why
Paul Thigpen, a Yale-trained religious historian and Catholic convert, wrote
The Rapture Trap.
Though he writes from a Catholic perspective, Thigpen, an ex-Pentecostal
and former editor of Charisma magazine, takes care to demonstrate in the
book how none of the leaders of the Reformation believed in the Rapture.
He says the "historical myopia" of American culture leaves people
vulnerable to those who can exploit ignorance of the past with convincing
presentations of vivid theologies. Besides, America has always been fertile
ground for apocalyptic religion.
"In the early days, the Puritans thought the Kingdom of God would
start in North America, in their colony," Thigpen says. "We have
several large denominations in America, such as the Jehovah's Witnesses,
who owe their existence to millennial fervor."
Eschatalogically-focused expressions of faith have swelled in popularity
during times of social distress and dislocation, such as after the Civil
War, and during the period of rapid industrialization and immigration. There
was another great surge following World War II, says Thigpen, and again
in the 1970s, as a reaction to countercultural upheaval. The dispensationalist
apologetic The Late Great Planet Earth was the best-selling nonfiction
book of the decade, and though he has never apologized for his erroneous
predictions in that book, author Hal Lindsey continues to be considered
by many an authority on biblical prophecy. Being a dispensationalist evangelist
means never having to say you're sorry.
| I would wake up every morning in a mild state of panic,
wondering if the Rapture had happened while I was sleeping, and I'd beenleft
behind! |
Why should any of this matter? Apocalyptic beliefs dictate
the behavior of many true believers. American dispensationalists were early
non-Jewish supporters of Zionism, believing that the ingathering of diaspora
Jews to their biblical homeland was a necessary precursor for the return
of Christ. Though many evangelicals and other Christians support Israel
today for other reasons, no small number of them do so because their end-times
belief mandates it. Thigpen is not so much worried that Rapture-expecting
Christians will blow up Jerusalem's Dome of the Rock to hasten Armageddon
as he is concerned about the spiritual harm that may result from acceptance
of dispensationalist beliefs.
"When times look tough and threatening, perhaps people find a comfort
in believing in the Rapture, that God will help them escape events before
they become too bad," Thigpen says. "Ideas have consequences.
One, the Rapture doctrine ignores the redemptive power of suffering, which
is a powerful Christian theme. Two, the Bible also shows that God chastises
his people as well as their enemies; believers share in suffering as well.
Three, if people wrongly believe Christians won't be around for the persecution
that Scripture tells us will precede the Second Coming, they won't prepare
themselves spiritually or otherwise."
"What we're dealing with are people who are scared and confused
by what's going on in the world today, and who aren't getting the information
they need to separate what's real from what's vain and even harmful speculation,"
Thigpen says. "As Christians, we believe Jesus is coming back, and
we have to be ready for that to happen at any moment. But this game of 'plug
the headline into the Scripture verse,' or into the latest message from
a supposed apparition, is a losing proposition." © 2002 National Review Online,
nationalreview.com. Reprinted by permission.
Rod Dreher is a Senior Writer at National
Review Online.
Left Behind: Prophecy or Fantasy?
by Peter Chattaway
End-times books always create, and cash in
on, a sense of urgency. The Left Behind industry -- books, movies,
clothes, even a race car -- is becoming the most successful end-times phenomenon
yet, not only because it is riding a wave of millennial interest but because
of some first-class marketing and some compelling storytelling by Jerry
Jenkins, the principal writer.
But the Left Behind craze is just the latest incursion of an evangelical
end-times subculture that has simmered beneath the surface of mainstream
pop culture for at least three decades.
Although the books will provide millions of non-Christians a close encounter
with evangelical faith, they are based on beliefs about the end of the world
that are of fairly recent origin and are widely disputed even among conservative
Christians.
The End According to Whom?
Left Behind, the first book, became a publishing juggernaut soon
after its 1995 debut. The series has now sold more than 30 million copies.
The two most recent volumes, The Indwelling and The Mark,
topped the New York Times Bestseller List. Since publishing the first book,
Tyndale House in Wheaton, Ill., has doubled both its staff and revenue.
In addition to the books, another 10 million related items, such as wallpaper
and postcards, have been sold. The Left Behind brand also includes
a spin-off series for juvenile readers, a website that attracts 60,000 hits
a day, one not-so-phenomenal movie and a sequel in the works, an upcoming
series on PAX TV, an interactive online game, screensavers and sponsorship
of racers on the Winston Cup and Craftsman Truck circuits. Much more than
an example of successful crossover marketing, it has become a pop culture
phenomenon.
| Belief in the Rapture is so pervasive among evangelicals
-- who pride themselves in their literal interpretation of the Bible --
that many don't realize it is a relatively recent doctrine with little basis
in the Scriptures. |
It started with a novel, written by Jenkins to follow an
end-times outline offered by Tim LaHaye, a fixture in the evangelical world.
LaHaye and Jenkins have since produced eight books of a total 12 planned,
with Jesus set to return in the final book, Glorious Appearing, due out
in 2004.
The storyline features a Rapture in which millions of God-fearing people
are zapped instantly into heaven, the rise of a Romanian
Antichrist and use of a computer-chip implant as the mark of the Beast.
The central characters, left behind after the Rapture, get a second chance
at salvation. The books move chronologically from the Rapture through seven
years of tribulation leading up to the return of Christ.
The end-times scenario of Left Behind has drawn divergent reactions
from Christians. Lutherans, Roman Catholics, Episcopalians and United Methodists
generally think Jesus will return and judge everyone immediately, then reign
forever. Leaders in these denominations argue that the notion of nonbelievers
left behind for seven years is wrong, a misreading of the book of Revelation,
which is a difficult, symbolic text.
Belief in the Rapture is so pervasive among evangelicals -- who pride
themselves in their literal interpretation of the Bible -- that many don't
realize it is a relatively recent doctrine with little basis in the Scriptures.
Revelation: According to John Darby or the Apostle John?
Most articles on the Left Behind series have said it is based
on the book of Revelation, but that is only partly true. The worldview reflected
in these books and films can be traced back to the teachings of John Nelson
Darby, a former Anglo-Irish priest who founded the Plymouth Brethren sect
in the 19th century, and whose views were popularized on this continent
by the Scofield Reference Bible in 1909.
Darby tried to synthesize the Bible's many prophetic passages into an
interpretative scheme he called dispensationalism. He believed that world
history, past and future, was divided into distinct eras, or dispensations,
and that God had a different way of dealing with humanity in each of them.
Like a number of Christians, Darby was a premillennialist -- that is,
he believed the world would have to endure seven years of great suffering
before Jesus could return and reign over the earth in person during the
Millennium. However, it was Darby who introduced the Rapture -- based on
the prediction in 1 Thessalonians 4:17 that believers will "meet the
Lord in the air." Before the seven years of suffering could begin,
Darby believed, Jesus would scoop up all the true believers and take them
to heaven, so that they could avoid the horrors of the Antichrist's reign.
Ah, Millennialists!
Darby's views were not widely accepted at first. Most Christians, following
the lead of Saint Augustine, were either amillennialists -- who believed
the Millennium should be understood as a metaphor for the age of the Church
-- or postmillennialists, who believed that it was up to Christians to perfect
the world and thus usher in the Millennium themselves.
According to these views, Jesus would return after the Millennium had
already taken place.
In more recent years, Christians who refuse to get sidetracked by this
debate have quipped that they are "panmillennialists" -- that
is, they believe it will all "pan out" in the end.
Most evangelicals were postmillennialists, and it was this belief in
the need for social transformation that fueled their efforts to abolish
slavery and win the rights of women. But by the early 20th century, they
were growing discouraged. True reform was difficult if not impossible. Missionaries
overseas met with resistance. Churches back home turned to more liberal
interpretations of the Bible. The Christianization of the world seemed increasingly
unlikely. In the 1920s, fundamentalists were pushed even further to the
margins of society, following the public relations disasters of Prohibition
and the Scopes trial.
The idea that God would remove all the true believers and then exact
his judgment on the rest of the world appealed to an increasingly marginalized
community.
Instead of saving the world, some evangelicals began to get involved
in activities that would bring the world closer to its end. Dispensationalists
believed that the Jews would return to Israel before Jesus returned, and
some of them campaigned on behalf of the Zionist movement. In 1948, their
efforts were successful, and the modern state of
Israel was created. For many evangelicals, the end of the world was now
just around the corner.
And when the world went through the massive social, spiritual, political
and economic upheavals of the late 1960s, Hal Lindsey popularized dispensationalism
once again in a book called The Late Great Planet Earth, which came
out in 1970 and became one of the hottest books of the decade, selling over
18 million copies
Lindsey strongly hinted that he expected the Rapture to take place sometime
in the 1980s, after the establishment of Israel. He was not alone in this
belief. When I was in the early hormonal stages of adolescence, I came across
a friend's copy of a book entitled Will Christ Return by 1988? 101 Reasons
Why, and I lamented that the Rapture would most likely take place while
I was still a virgin.
This worldview has had all sorts of political and social consequences.
Although Jesus himself blessed peacemakers, many evangelicals are suspicious
of peace talks, especially in the Middle East.
In 1981, James Watt, Secretary of the Interior under Ronald Reagan, famously
told Congress that there was little point in protecting the environment,
since the Second Coming could be just around the corner.
Marketing Fear
To the unbeliever, the end-times industry is no doubt funny, if perhaps
a little creepy. Yet the people who tell these stories in book, music and
film want very much to be taken seriously, and Left Behind is their
most earnest effort yet. They know that book, record and box office sales
translate to cultural clout, something evangelicals crave.
Although these writers and filmmakers claim their first goal is to win
souls, some people will ask if these artists are selling their own.
There are other moral questions posed by the end-times worldview. As
Christian ethicist David Gushee points out, the Left Behind series capitalizes
on "the most passionately held fears and suspicions of a certain strain
of American evangelical Christianity."
It is a worldview, warns Gushee, that is built on "anti-multilateralism,
anti-pacifism, anti-United Nations, anti-internationalism, anti-ecumenism,
anti-Catholicism [and] conspiracy-theory thinking," all elements the
conservative scholar finds in Left Behind. Peter
Chattaway is a free-lance film critic in British Columbia, Canada, and associate
editor at B.C. Christian News (peter@chattaway.com). This story includes
contributions from Karen Long for Religion News Service. |
Return to Plain Truth Ministries Home
Page |