|
A Sacred Space
by Stephan A. Schwartz
In the silent darkness, spread out in the night across
the Maryland fields,
I see thousands upon thousands of little points of light—small brown
bags, each with a flickering candle. One for every dead or wounded soldier
both, North
and South.
On this first Saturday in December, volunteers have risen early, as they have
for the past 15 years, to prepare this one-night citizen ceremony. Elderly widows, retired generals and entry-level clerks place the bags
across the Antietam battlefield and light each candle by dusk. The tiny flames
float in the dark, their twinkling pattern undulating across the gentle hills;
it is a haunting image, profoundly moving.
Most Americans think of D-Day as our nation’s benchmark for carnage.
Yet that most massive amphibious assault, the product of months of planning
by the greatest armies ever assembled, does not begin to compare to the moment-of-opportunity
battle
fought in a few small farm fields with mostly single-shot muzzle-loaders and
horse-drawn cannon.
| When it was over, 12 hours after it
had begun at sunrise on the morning of September 17, 1862, it was the
greatest single day of blood sacrifice in American history. |
It was called the Battle of Antietam. The name derived from Antietam Creek,
a beautiful winding stream with wooded banks. Because the Union named battles
after geographical features and because the North won, the name
stuck. But in the South, it was known as the Battle of Sharpsburg —the
Confederacy named battles after nearby towns. By either name, when it was
over, 12 hours
after it had begun at sunrise on the morning of September 17, 1862, it was
the greatest single day of blood sacrifice in American history.
More than three times as many Americans were killed or wounded at Antietam
as on June 6, 1944—the so-called “longest day” of World
War II. More soldiers, in fact, were killed and wounded at Antietam than
during
the American
Revolution, the War of 1812, The Mexican War (1846-1848) and the Spanish-American
War (1898) combined.
The blood shed that day gave Abraham Lincoln the political security to issue the Emancipation Proclamation, the most important statement
on the Bill of Rights. His edict completed America’s Declaration of
Independence, becoming the defining act of the Civil War.
Lincoln wrote the Proclamation by himself and, although it freed only those
slaves living in the states in rebellion, it laid the groundwork for the
13th Amendment
by reducing the conflict to its moral essence—slavery. The reward for that
act of public virtue was the continued integrity of the United States as a nation.
Europe—where slavery was outlawed—could no longer support a Confederacy
that made slavery a legal fundamental. America would no longer be pressured
by outside sources to split, and the Monroe Doctrine, protecting the New
World from
Old World incursions, would not cease.
| This serene space provides the moment
necessary to appreciate the battle’s mythic quality: A fight over
freedom, on land belonging to a sect whose doctrine was rooted in the
idea of Christian love. |
I am drawn back to the battlefield the next day, and in the warm afternoon
light it is an intimate landscape, almost unchanged from the day of the
battle. It’s hard to imagine 160,000 men massing here for a fight.
Harder still, as two squirrel’s chatter and chase each other across
a tree, to imagine the groans of pain, the acrid smell of black powder, the
broken men,
overturned gun carriages and dead horses that were the battle’s physical
aftermath. When it was over, 12,401 Union and 10,318 confederates —22,719
in all—would be dead, wounded or missing.
The Little Church on the Battlefield
This was the farmland of a small spiritual community, the Dunker Brethren,
and their church building was the battle’s tactical objective. As
then, it is a little white brick building with green shutters, a shake
shingle
roof and
a chimney in the center. Two stone steps led up into a single low room,
two windows on each wall, two doors and in the middle, an endearing small,
black
pot-bellied
stove. Simple pine benches face a pine table, behind which are two smaller
benches. Nothing on the walls, not even a cross. These were people whose
spiritual life
was internal; their services were meditations. Sitting in the cool, dim
quiet of this simple room, the dignity of this dwelling pervades the senses.
This serene space provides the moment necessary to appreciate the battle’s
mythic quality: A fight over freedom, on land belonging to a sect whose
doctrine was rooted in the idea of Christian love.
“
The white-washed Dunker Church stood out like a lighted window against the dark
green of the West Woods,” one veteran said. It was all on a Wednesday,
the first time this Civil War touched Northern soil.
The carnage was caused mostly by the field artillery: Horse-drawn Parrott rifles,
Napoleons and 10-pounders, some less than 500 yards from their intended targets.
They spewed out hundreds of marble-sized balls of shot. Or if not this, then
single projectiles as big as fireplace logs that scythed down corn stalks, men
and horses. The sound was deafening. It left stunned any men still standing.
Along the verge of the narrow farm roads, granite, marble and cast-iron monuments
sit irregularly in the fields like wayward tombstones. Each marks a company or
brigade, enumerating its dead and wounded. There is no doubt: This land is a
sacred space.
Many of the soldiers that September morning were teenagers from farms and
frontiers but, for all their youth, they were already hardened veterans.
Blood and war
had taught them about hiding behind rocks, keeping loose ranks, retreating
when appropriate. But that isn’t how their officers saw the fight.
Weapons of the Battle
On both sides, particularly before early casualties reduced their number,
the officer corps was a product of the Mexican War—West Pointers
trained in the Napoleonic tactics built around the limitations of the musket.
Muskets
were
smooth-bore weapons; the long tube of the barrel had no grooves to give
a bullet the spin needed to shoot accurately. Its effective range was only
about 70
to 100 yards. The Old World solution to these inadequacies was to bunch
men
close
together, to get them all to aim and fire as a group
— in essence, to create a collective shotgun pointed at the enemy. If no
single bullet could be assured of reaching its mark, a hail of them was sure
to hit
something. Field cannon interspersed with blocs of muskets was, at the
time, the surest offensive tactic.
The noise and smoke this combat produced made voice commands impossible
to hear over any distance and hand signals useless, so men were trained
to move
at an
exact pre-ordained and robotic pace, staying so close together they were
literally touching as they faced the enemy’s fire. Young soldiers
were taught to stay in a bloc, and not to run.
| These people gathered here, country
boys, city workers, many away from home for the first time…prepared
to die over the status of black people whom most did not know, members
of a race a surprising
number had never even seen. |
These stylized group movements made the musket an effective weapon, but
when armies converted to rifles, the tactic was horribly wrong and caused
mass
death. The rifle’s long barrel had parallel grooves spiraling down
its length, giving bullets a stabilizing spin, making them effective
at 300 yards. By the
time of Antietam, rifles had largely replaced the musket, particularly
in the Union army. Yet the mass movement of troops had not altered. Standing
on the
brow of a low hill where those young men in blue and butternut had stood
facing one another, no one could doubt that any man knew what to expect
that
morning.
A Family Fight
Over the previous 18 days they had fought two pitched battles—South Mountain
and Second Manassas—as well as many skirmishes, and they were exhausted
and battle-weary. Many Confederates had literally walked through their boots
and were barefoot or had only rags round their feet. Standing or kneeling in
the Brethren’s fields, they knew that many of them would die; knew their
officers’ tactics would kill them, yet they fought anyway. Why? Politicians
and commentators had complex arguments involving states’ rights
and legal claims. For these soldiers it was simpler, and more authentic.
In
later interviews,
and in their diaries and journals, they give two main reasons: They did not want to let down
their friends, the men standing to the left and right with whom they had lived
and fought and marched; and because, at its deepest level, this was a family
fight, brewing for years, that had to be settled.
My 95-year-old mother, who grew up in Kentucky, tells a story of my own family.
When war was declared, the family was at dinner. Two great-uncles she would never
know stood up, shook hands and left the room; one to serve the Confederacy, the
other the Union. Both were killed at Antietam.
The American Civil War was unique. It was a disagreement within one racial
family so profound that only war could resolve it. At no other time in
history has one
race fought a war amongst itself over the status of another race. The
unresolved dispute of the Constitutional Convention, and the Constitution’s
tortured legalism in which a slave was counted as three-fifths of a white
man, came
down to this battle. These people gathered here, country boys, city workers,
many
away from home for the first time, speaking the same language, sharing
the same roots, prepared to die over the status of black people whom most did not know, members of a race a surprising number
had never even seen.
The Symmetry of Sacrifice
It is hard to get a reliable number on how many slaves arrived first
in the colonies and then the states. But most historians accept that from 1700 to 1861 (excluding imports
into Louisiana when it was French) the figure was about 400,000 African men and women.
The human cost of men under arms is also hard to pin down, but most scholars
believe 618,000 (360,000 Union, 258,000 Confederate) died from battle and disease.
There is a horrible and unacknowledged symmetry of sacrifice here.
George Mason, the father of the Bill of Rights, had told his colleagues
at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that slavery was a moral error
that
would bring “the
judgment of heaven on the United States. As nations cannot be rewarded or punished
in the next world, they must be in this. By an inevitable chain of causes and
effects Providence punishes national sins by national calamities.” Antietam
proved the truth of his prediction.
A small bird lands near me, as I am standing where an Ohio regiment stood that
morning. There were birds that day as well. The hills and fields look now as
they looked then. The scattered farm buildings I can see are the same ones those
young boys saw.
Sergeant Thomas F. Galwey of the 8th Ohio Infantry said there was no shelter
to be found in the field in front of him, which was speckled with white clover.
It was a mystery to him how so many men could fit into so small a space. As he was kneeling in the grass, he noticed that every blade was moving,
and he supposed it was the result of crickets disturbed by the battle. When
he said this to the man next to him, all he got in return was a mordant laugh.
Then he saw that what caused the grass to tremble
was not crickets, but the hail of bullets coming toward them as the Confederates
advanced.
More than a century later, many may still see only failure in how we
as a nation deal with race. But history, I think, will see us mostly
moving
forward
to
make real America’s
most fundamental precept of equal rights. What astonishes is not that
it takes sacrifices like Antietam to change the course of history, but
that
ordinary
Americans, mistrusted by politicians and disdained by theorists, have
always been prepared to stand
and make them.
© 2003 Stephan A. Schwartz
Stephan A. Schwartz is working on a biography of George Mason, to be published
by HarperCollins. A Virginia-based
writer, Schwartz has written for Smithsonian, Harper’s,
The New York Times and The Washington Post.
Return to Plain Truth Ministries
Home Page |