Question:  Dear Greg,

            I recently asked a church pastor about the differing views about the age of the earth, if he really believed that the earth could possibly be only about 7,000 years old because of scientific evidence to the contrary (of which I must admit that I am not very knowledgeable).  He replied that there are arguments for both sides of this question.  I started thinking that maybe science makes assumptions in its dating of the earth, assuming that radioactive materials break down at the same rate for millions of years.  God could certainly cause these things to proceed at accelerated and decelerated rates.  Are there arguments for both sides of this issue that stand up to scrutiny?

            Dave

 

Answer:  Dear Dave,

            I have never seen any logical or scientifically accurate claim that the earth is less than either 6,000 or 7,000 years old.  The weight of all the evidence is on an earth that is perhaps several billions of years old.  The idea that God could accelerate or decelerate time of course is true—but to use it to try to claim the earth is much younger than all the facts prove is disingenuous.

            The argument stems from what some see as an absolute line in the sand—that each day of creation was a literal 24-hour period, and that God’s plan for man was that each day would represent 1000 years of history.  2 Peter 3:8 is often quoted, out of context, in this regard.  Some believe that if they compromise on the age of the earth, accepting it to be less than 6000 or 7000 years old, that the next step is to deny God as creator.

            By so doing they are drawing the line in the wrong place, and effectively alienating themselves (and anyone who would follow such teachings) from scientific fact.  Those who really suffer are students of science, who are torn between how God and the Bible are misrepresented to them, and scientific and historical fact.

            The dinosaurs prove that the age of the earth and the time of man’s existence on the earth are not one and the same thing.

            But even man’s existence on earth cannot be fit into 6000 years (the seventh one thousand time period being seen by most advocates of this idea as the millennial rule, after Christ’s return).

1.      Human civilization can easily be traced back ten to twelve thousand years—and those are conservative estimates.

2.  The 6000-year theory is also debunked by the time in which we live. Archbishop Ussher originally chose creation as BC 4004—and while that date has been revised by others, most chose some date before 4000 because it is impossible to fit Old Testament history into less than 4000 years.  We are living in 2001.  That makes 6001—actually 6002 because there is/was no year zero.

            In Christ,

            Greg Albrecht