Question:  Hi Greg,

            Does it say in Psalms 82 (which Jesus I believe quoted) that “if you be the children of God, then you are gods?”  Now, the way I seem to understand this is we will never be a part of the Godhead.  That will always be God the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit.  But Christ’s body (because Jesus is also a deity of that Godhead) is also the body of God.  So, in a sense you are still a god but not equal to the Godhead.  Just like when you have a family you in a sense are the parent of that family and you will always be that head.  But your children are still gods.  So, what do you think of the way I approach that?  Do you agree or disagree?  Thank you again!

            John

 

Answer:  Dear John,

            You quote Psalms 82 as support for the idea that while we will never be God (as God is God—for God is God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit), we may be gods.  You then note the analogy of a family, and that the children are never the parents, but they still have the family name.

1.      Psalms 82, verse 1—“God presides in the great assembly; he gives judgment among the “gods”.  In the following verses, verses 2-5, God charges the “gods” with failure to act impartially, in love, with justice, with care.  Then we read verses 6 and 7—“I said, ‘You are “gods”; you are all sons of the Most High.’  But you will die like mere men; you will fall like every other ruler.”

God is not referring to created humans as gods in Psalms 82, but as human rulers (see verse 7—“every other ruler”).  The word used for gods here is elohim, a word that is used for God (Genesis 1:1—among other words that are only used for God), angels (Psalms 8:4-6), and human beings (here in Psalms 82).

In the psalm God is addressing Hebrew judges who, because they exercised life and death decisions over people, were loosely called “gods.”  Notice in the NIV I quote above, the use of quotes around the use of elohim, translated “gods”—quotes here used to denote an ironical usage, not literal.  Also note, although these judges were called gods, they would die like “every other ruler” (verse 7).

            You are correct—Jesus quoted Psalms 82.  But first we should ask, in what context?  Failure to understand the context can make a biblical verse a pretext, a proof text of some premise that God did not inspire or intend.

            In John 10, Jesus is addressing Jews who were monotheists (just as Christians are).  Jews and Christians (and Moslems, for that matter) believe in only one God—not two, not three, and not hundreds of billions who will be born into the family of God.  That would be polytheism.  The Bible, from beginning to end, old covenant and new covenant, insists upon one true God.  No more.  Just one.

            The context of this passage is based upon Jesus’ teaching that he was the good shepherd (verses 1-21)—during which he makes overt claims to divinity (“I am the good shepherd”—verse 11—“my Father knows me and I know the Father”—verse 15).  Following this passage, the Jewish religious leaders asked him if he was the Christ, and to tell them plainly (verse 24).

            Jesus responded—“the miracles I do should speak for me”—meaning, his divinity (verse 25); “my sheep know me, they have eternal life, they will never perish (verse 28); “my Father, who has given the sheep to me, my Father and I are one (verse 30).

            The Jewish religious leaders picked up stones to stone him (verse 31).  Why?  Because they were monotheists.  They believed, carefully and religiously, the first commandment—“You shall have no other gods before me.”  Now Jesus was claiming to be one with God.  Jesus asked them, “For which of the miracles that I have done are you stoning me?” (verse 31).  The Jewish religious leaders responded that they were not stoning him because of the miracles he had done, but because of blasphemy—“because you, a mere man, claim to be God” (verse 33).

            Now we come to your question—assertion—in verse 34.  That entire context is necessary to answer the question—and to avoid misunderstanding of what Jesus was saying.      

1.      Jesus may have been making a clear connection between what God said to human leaders and judges in Psalms 82:6, and to what he, the Son of God, God in the flesh, the second person of the Godhead, was saying to them, religious leaders of the Jews.  Both groups of “gods” were derelict in their duties.

2.      Jesus was also saying if God even called human judges “gods”, then how much more can I call myself God’s Son? (verse 36).

            We should note that Jesus did not refer to all human beings as “gods”—neither does Psalms 82.  Only a special class or type of human beings—judges and rulers.

            Jesus was referring to Psalms 82 because it noted that judges and rulers have a divine appointment (further elaborated on by Paul in Romans 13), and because they made decisions in life and death issues.  How much more appropriate is it to address the literal Son of God, one who was not spoken of as a god in an ironic sense, with quote marks around the word, but the Unique One and Only, God with us, God in the flesh.

            To your question/comment about the family analogy, and if it is appropriate to use this analogy to establish spiritual reality: God reveals himself to humans in many ways.  One of the ways is as Father.  He is our Father in heaven, our spiritual Father, but of course, he is not our literal father.

            It is true that we are born again (John 3)—that we are new men and women in Christ, that we pass from death to life (John 5:24), that we rise from the watery grave of baptism, resurrected to new life in Christ (Romans 6).  We are thus God’s children.  But does this speak of a spiritual reality—that we are the very essence and nature of God?  No.  There is a monumental difference between Jesus, the Son of God, and human beings that are the sons of God.  Note the lack of capitalization for human sons.  Jesus was the Son of God by eternal right of inheritance (Colossians 1:15), we are sons of God by adoption (Romans 8:15).  He was the Son of God by nature, we are created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27) and remade in the image of Him by redemption (Colossians 3:10).

            To summarize—Jesus is the natural Son of God—God by nature.  We are adopted sons.  Jesus has no beginning; he is uncreated.  We have a beginning—we are created.  Jesus is the Creator—we are the being or creature that is created.  Jesus is God by nature, we are not God by nature, and we never will be.  We are given eternal life by God’s grace; Jesus is eternal by nature.  He has no beginning and no end, “the Alpha and Omega…who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty (Revelation 1:8).

            We are not in God’s family by nature or by essence, we are his children by grace, by spiritual re-birth, and by divine adoption.  We are not God and never will be.  We are humans who are given, by God’s grace, eternal life.

            In Christ,

            Greg Albrecht