Question:  Dear Greg,

            Why do some Bibles have other additional books that are not contained in other versions?  Someone told me these additional books are only included in the Catholic Bible.  I know they are called the Apocrypha.  My questions are:

1.      Why are they called the Apocrypha?

2.      Why do some Bibles have them and some do not?  Some say it is because the Apocrypha are not considered revelatory writings from God, unlike the existing books we now have in the Bible.  Is this true?

3.      What criteria did the people who completed our existing Bible use to determine which books should be included in the present Bible and which should not?

            Thanks very much once more!

            Marciel

 

Answer:  Dear Marciel,

            The word “apocrypha” comes from the Greek, meaning “hidden things.”  The word has come to mean “untrue” or “spurious”.

            The apocrypha (both Old Testament and New Testament books) were not included in the original canon.  The earliest Old Testament canon dates to AD 170 and the earliest New Testament canon to AD 367.  The first undisputed Christian council on the canon dates to the Council of Carthage in AD 397.  After that time the 39 Old Testament books and 27 New Testament books became progressively more accepted as the Bible, with other books being viewed, at best, as extra-biblical, if not spurious.

            Extra-biblical books that do not disagree with biblical writing tend to be viewed with more patience by Christians, and read as historical, while not inspired.  Others are spurious, as they do not agree with the biblical record.

            In Christ,

            Greg Albrecht