Question:  Dear Greg,

            I have been studying Revelation in as much depth as I can.  I started with Daniel, went through Matthew, and now I’m into the 4th chapter of Revelation.  My question is this: how would you explain just what the Olivet Discourse is, if someone like myself asked you?  I only read it once and I want to read it again.  The other day someone had asked me what was involved with the Discourse but I was unsure just how to explain it, so I told that person I would get a professional answer for them.  I just wasn’t comfortable giving an answer that might be wrong and giving someone a false understanding of the way God meant it to be. 

            Thank you again for your help.  God bless you and your ministry.

            Nickie

 

Answer:  Dear Nickie,

            Glad to be of assistance.  First, some questions for you.  If you are studying Revelation, then why did you start your study with Daniel and then Matthew?  I know why, but I am questioning the wisdom of the interpretation that teaches us to study Revelation by studying Daniel and parts of Matthew.  Someone must have encouraged you to do this, but God gives no such interpretation to us.  It is humanly derived.  By saying that such a view is humanly derived does not mean it is either right or wrong on its face, but it does tell us that it is not the only way, and perhaps not even a legitimate way of studying the book of Revelation.

            For more on this line of thinking, use our feature “Search our Site”.  Just type in words and phrases like “end times”, “tribulation”, “rapture”, “dispensationalism”, and “great tribulation” and you will be given many sources to read and study.

            Matthew 24—what would I say about it? 

1.      It represents some of Jesus’ teaching about the future.

2.      It contains some specific and some general comments and predictions.

3.      The teachings can be viewed in a variety of ways.  These ways are also used to interpret the book of Revelation—a great resource that gives this background is a book called “Revelation—Four Views”, edited by Steve Gregg, Thomas Nelson publishers.  We review this book and the variety of Christian responses to views about the end times in our March/April 2003 issue of “The Plain Truth”. 

4.  We should consider the immediate context of chapter 24, as we understand it.

The book of Matthew first of all—his specific emphasis as compared to the other three synoptic gospels—as well as the Gospel of John.  In addition, we should keep in mind the immediate context—chapter 23, which is a scathing denunciation by Jesus of religious leadership.  Instead of leading people to God, they actually lead people away from God, sometimes to themselves or to other human leaders (so let’s keep that in mind as we read Matthew 24!).  Then, chapter 25, which contains three parables about judgment.  Three stories that do not give specific details but in broad-brush strokes speak of the future and of judgment.  This chapter and its teaching should be part of our understanding of Matthew 24.

            Lots more to say but out of time.  Hope this helps.  May God bless you.

            In Christ,

            Greg Albrecht