Question:  Hello Greg!

            I have been looking into the information on the Ugaritic cuneiform tablets found at Ras Sahmra in 1929.  Apparently Israel borrowed some of these myths and Canaanite practices of which the prophets vehemently spoke out against.  Some of the names for God that the Israelites used were also used by the Canaanites, such as El Shaddai, El Elyon, etc.  Even the name Yahweh is used on a tablet representing a son of El, the Canaanites’ “father of the gods”.  I am confident that you are aware of some of this?  I have to admit that because I am a believer in God and Jesus Christ that this troubles me somewhat.  Some may come to the conclusion that Israel adopted these myths and that the God of the Bible is a myth borrowed from the Canaanites.  I do not come to this conclusion, but still it is a little troubling.  What is your viewpoint on this matter?

            Alex

Answer:  Dear Alex,

            There is no doubt that many of the customs of the Hebrews, including root forms of words and language, were similar to that of their neighbors.  In some cases their customs may have been used before.  This fact is not a news flash.

            Nowhere does the Bible claim that every practice and worship form that God instructed the Hebrews to follow was innovative, new, never-before-used or implemented by other cultures.  Some energetic, sincere but misguided preachers may have claimed otherwise, but the fact is, if God gave instructions about worship that included forms already in use, in slightly differing ways, God knew what he was doing.  If he did, such a fact would not detract from the unique and one and only way in which the one true God was revealing himself to the Hebrews.

            As readers of detective novels know, there are many perspectives that are used in looking at evidence.  The old story about the five blind men who were each feeling a different part of the elephant’s body is instructive.  They each gave a very different report.  The findings you cite were used by liberal scholars at the time of their finding to discredit any unique claims of the Bible—either for Jews or for Christians.  But they do not.  It is a fallacy to presume that all of God’s instructions to the Hebrews involved and included exclusive never-before-used customs or language forms.

            In Christ,

            Greg Albrecht