Question:  Dear Greg,

            I have a question about the seventh day Sabbath.  Isaiah 66:22-23 says that the Sabbath will be kept in the new heavens and new earth and all mankind will come and bow down before the Lord.  That doesn’t sound optional.  If the Sabbath is kept then, why not now?  If it isn’t optional then, why should it be optional now?  I mean Saturday, not Sunday, or a choice of either.

            Mike

 

Answer:  Dear Mike,

            Several principles of Bible study and understanding need to be clarified before addressing your question.

1.      The Bible does not contradict itself.

2.      Before a passage of the Bible has a meaning to us now, it first of all had a meaning to the individuals who heard and/or read the passage first—i.e. the original audience.  Any understanding we have, any application we make, must flow from that understanding.  A failure to do so is jumping to a conclusion and an assumption that the Bible only has meaning for us.  Of course many examples of failing to follow this principle could be given to demonstrate that the Bible would then be open to our subjective interpretations, which as Christians we do not want to do.

3.  All passages must be read within their context—the historical, cultural and literary (the type of writing and the theme of the book of the Bible in which the passage in question appears).

            Those are three critical keys (PTM has a booklet about understanding the Bible that gives many others, with examples) that we need to keep in mind with your question/assertion. 

            You state that Isaiah 66:22-23 means, to you, that the seventh day, Saturday Sabbath is not optional.  Here’s a good question to ask ourselves as we study the Bible.  Are we asking the Bible to validate what we already believe, or are we looking to the Bible to correct and teach us?  If we are looking for verses and passages that support our view (such a practice is called proof-texting) then we must understand that we are “using” the Bible.  A text without a context is a pretext, which, if you forgive me, is what you are trying to force Isaiah 66:22 to say.

            If proof-texting is what we are doing (and all of us do that from time to time—it is hard to lay aside prior beliefs when one comes to the Bible), we must ask ourselves a question.  We need to ask, “where and when did I decide to believe what I believe, the belief that I am searching the Bible to support?  Is my understanding a tradition I have received from the gospel of Jesus Christ—from all of the Bible—or from some other place/time/source/tradition?”

            Isaiah is a book of prophecy—not of predictive prophecy that tells us exactly when Jesus will return, but a book of prophecy about hope for the future, about the blessed Hope, the Messiah, the Suffering Servant, the Branch, the root of Jesse, the Son born to a virgin, etc.  The emphasis of Isaiah, the foundation of Isaiah, is the Lion and the Lamb, typified by Jesus the Lamb of God and Jesus the Lion of the tribe of Judah (see Revelation 5 for example).

            Chapter 66 is the last chapter—the last of a number of chapters giving hope to the original audience.  Who was the original audience?  Jews, under the old covenant.  The audience was Jews who did not know of the cross of Christ, who did not know of a new covenant, who did not know of the birth, death and resurrection of our Lord and Savior.  How would God inspire Isaiah to help them understand how glorious a future day, after their death, would be?  By using language about realities they did not understand?  Would he tell them about worship services to honor the birth of God in the flesh, to honor and celebrate the resurrection? 

            Did the Jews understand the cross at the time of Isaiah?  Did they, for that matter, understand it at the time when Jesus died for our sins?  What was it, by way of reminder, that caused the Jews to want to kill Jesus—and eventually to act on that desire?  Because he was breaking the Sabbath and because he was calling God his Father—making himself equal to God, very God, God in the flesh (see John 5:18).

            After all that Jesus did (as described to us in the pages of the New Testament), revealing to us who and what God is, helping us understand what the old covenant was all about (see books like Romans, Galatians, 2 Corinthians, Hebrews, Colossians, etc.)—are we to assume, by what you propose, that Jesus will return the second time and say, “Just kidding about the cross.  It wasn’t that drastic.  We need to go back to eating kosher, sacrifices in the temple, Sabbath, holy days (all of them, not just the ones you might be thinking about—read Leviticus 23:9-14 for example), etc., etc.”  Will Jesus REVERSE everything he said and did on earth when he returns, and is that reversal hidden in one proof-text in Isaiah 66:22?

            What does Isaiah 66:22 mean?  It means that Jews are being promised, in less than specific terminology, that a new day is coming.  They are being given hope.  They (and all Christians who read it within the original context) are being told that a new world is coming, and they are being told about it in a way that they will understand.  All people will keep Sabbath—just like Zechariah talked of a worldwide, all humanity feast of tabernacles (Zechariah 14:6) as something the people he wrote to would understand.

            But does that mean such a specific thing will happen?  Only if nothing happened after Isaiah 66 and Zechariah 14.  But something did happen.  Someone did come to this earth—God in the flesh.  He changed everything.  He had that power because, among other things, as he told the Jews in the book of John, “before Abraham was I am” (John 8:58 ).

            Be sure and read the entire eighth chapter of John in context—and as you have time, the entire Gospel of John will help you with your question.

            The Sabbath is not optional—it is not even relevant.  It has no meaning to Christians.  Christ is our meaning, he is our Savior, he is our rest, he is our sign, and he is our Sabbath.  The Sabbath is not Sunday—the Sabbath has never been changed.  It is kept, observed and broken by Jews and all those who choose to live under the old covenant.  Those who accept Jesus are not under the old covenant—in any way.

            Hope this helps with your question.

            In Christ,

            Greg Albrecht