Question:  Dear Greg,

            Last week I stumbled upon an agnostic/atheist website by accident.  I counted over 315 alleged discrepancies of the Bible they have listed.  I have to admit that I was somewhat devastated when I read some of them (I felt like young David against Goliath).  When I began to read some of the apparent discrepancies I began to realize that there were some logical explanations to the apparent contradictions.  I thought to myself, “What a tragedy for those who read the information in this website.”

            I plan to respond to the accusations.  I do not believe that I will be able to convince them that the Bible is without error.  However, I at least hope to show them (and whoever reads the material on their website) that there are solutions that are possible to their accusations.  Perhaps some good may come of it.  I do not believe that these accusations should go unchallenged (1 Peter 3:15 ).

            I believe the Bible is worth defending.  I do not want to appear argumentative, but lovingly show the agnostics and atheists that Christians are not expected to trust the Bible as the Word of God based only on blind faith.  Our faith is based on factual evidence.

            May God bless you and your ministry,

            Al

 

Answer:  Dear Al,

            Questions that come from sources like the one you mention include an agenda.  There are many ways to twist and distort any kind of literature—whether that is the Bible, or what Charles Dickens or William Shakespeare wrote.  Methods used by those who twist and distort the Bible do not follow accepted rules of reading and understanding literature.  The easiest way to prove that is to take the methodology used to twist and distort the Bible and use the same methodology on some other kind of literature.

            When people either point out, manufacture or fabricate contradictions and discrepancies they often juxtapose two statements that seem to war with each other.  They ignore the context, the kind of literature (genre) being used within the Bible and then try to make the Bible contradict itself.  An example: pick up the newspaper.  It’s all the newspaper.  Read a selected portion from the classified ads.  Then read a comic strip and compare it with that classified ad.  Then read a news item from the front page.  Compare that with the story of a football game on the sports page, or a society event in another part of the paper.  They are all “true”.  They all report about reality, transmit truth in different ways.  To compare them indiscriminately and then pronounce that the newspaper itself is telling lies and is discredited is to either be ignorant or to willfully distort.  Many alleged biblical discrepancies are so silly and irresponsible, and argumentative, that they do not deserve an answer because there is no basis in establishing common ground.

            I cannot give a class on logic, hermeneutics or methodology here, but I can refer you to excellent books to help you understand the Bible.  Two that might help you are “How to Read the Bible for all it’s Worth” by Fee and Stuart and “Scripture Twisting” by James W. Sire.

            May God bless you.

            In Christ,

            Greg Albrecht