Question:  Dear Greg,

            Some Christians at work have wondered about the prophetic possibilities of the current U.S. action in Iraq.  While I don’t think that we can ever be sure about what God is going to do in the near term based on prophecy, I find it perplexing that people seem to assume the worst.  They believe that the end may be right around the corner.  I’ve pointed out to these people a surprising possibility.

            Consider the possibility that God may have raised up the U.S. as a superpower for a different purpose.  The U.S. already has provided the state of Israel with the help it needed to be a viable country.  The post 9/11 geo-political situation is putting the U.S. on a collision course with fundamentalist religious zealots and violent dictators throughout the Middle East.  While it may be difficult for the U.S. to bring about a good outcome in Iraq and the entire Middle East, the dire political consequences that will ensue if the U.S. should fail will be enormous.  Pulitzer Prize winning author and columnist Thomas Freidman mentioned that it is in the best interest of the U.S. not to fail in this enormous task.  Someone pointed out that in the last 5 or 10 years that the U.S. has spent more money modernizing its military than all other nations combined.

            Now for an equally plausible prophetic scenario to those currently circulating.  Consider that God could be bringing peace for a time to the Middle East.  For how can Israel fit the prophecy of a non-militarized state and apparently exceptionally prosperous country that doesn’t spend its money on military defense—unless Israel is a non-militarized state and wealthy.  U.S. dominance over the region could give Israel the sense of security that it needs to bring about this peace.  Israel has a lot of talent and if the dark political and military cloud over Israel dissipates, then the investment and prosperity that will take place among this vibrant, diverse and very highly educated people will probably be astounding.

            Ezekiel 38:10-12 says, “This is what the Sovereign Lord says: On that day thoughts will come into your mind and you will devise an evil scheme.  You will say, ‘I will invade a land of unwalled villages; I will attack a peaceful and unsuspecting people—all of them living without walls and without gates and bars.  I will plunder and loot and turn my hand against the resettled ruins and the people gathered from the nations, rich in livestock and goods, living at the center of the land.” (NIV)

            When I entered the conversation that my religious co-worker started, I explained that the current situation could also be viewed from a prophetic viewpoint in which peace could come to the Middle East.  He added that over a hundred years ago Scofield (who wrote the Scofield Study Bible) did a historical study to see if that prophecy in Ezekiel was ever fulfilled.  Scofield concluded, he said, that it was never fulfilled.

            War will probably be in the future of the U.S. for quite some time.

            May God grant you boldness to do his will and grant you clarity and accuracy in your communications.

            Tom

 

Answer:  Dear Tom,

            I appreciate the thoughts you offer, but at best, the thoughts about what the Bible says specifically about any war that is current or anticipated are subject to subjective interpretation.  On a related note, apart from biblical interpretation, what we perceive God to be doing or not doing is similar.  If we can divorce our thoughts about what we believe God is doing or not doing from specific thoughts about “what a passage means” then we have a better chance of understanding God, in my opinion.

            A basic rule of biblical understanding is the credo that a passage may not have a meaning it never did.  That is, we must find the meaning of the passage for the original audience, in its original milieu and culture before we attempt any exegesis for our day.  Put another way, we cannot jump to a conclusion about a biblical passage, deciding that it means something that it never did.  All interpretation must be grounded in the original understanding, with obvious allowances for history, culture, etc.  This is not to say that the Bible does not have meaning for us today—it does.  But the Scofield Study Bible school of biblical interpretation is sensational, flawed and biblically bankrupt.

            At the end of the day, the Sermon on the Mount, the cross of Christ and the empty tomb have infinitely more to say and are far more spiritually relevant than what C.I. Scofield and his followers think about Ezekiel’s prophecies.  In the context of the cross, the prophecies all center in the person of Jesus in any case, for he is the only source of life, the Prince of Peace—the only way to peace.  May he rule in our hearts and may we truly focus on him.

            In Christ,

            Greg Albrecht